Medical law

• Amundson, R, and Tresky, S. 2007. “On A Bioethical Challenge to Disability Rights”. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 32: 541-561
• Amundson, R. and Tresky, S. 2008. “Bioethics and Disability Rights: Conflicting Values and Perspectives”. Bioethical Inquiry 5:111-123.
• Campbell, A. "The Body in Bioethics" 2009 Routledge Cavendish (2009)
• Goering, S. 2008. “‘You Say You’re Happy, But …’: Contested Quality of Life Judgments in Bioethics and Disability Studies”. Bioethical Inquiry 5: 125-135
• Koch, T. “Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values” (2006) 31 J. Medicine & Philosophy 251-267
• Kuczewski, M. 2001. “Disability: An Agenda for Bioethics”. American Journal of Bioethics 1: 36-44
• Kuczewski, M. 2001. “Disability: An Agenda for Bioethics”. American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 1, Issue 3, 36-44
• McLean, S. and Williamson, L. "Impairment and Disability: law and ethics at the beginning and end of life" Routledge Cavendish (2007)
• Théberge, P. “Technology Creative Practice and Copyright”. In "Music and Copyright", eds by Frith, S. and Marshall, L. (2nd ed.). 2004. Edinburgh University Press.

Copyright Law

• Abitabile, K. and Picerno, J. "Dance and the Choreographer's Dilemma: A Legal and Cultural Perspective on Copyright Protection for Choreographic Works" 27 Campbell L. Rev. 39 2004-2005
• Arnold, R. ’Reflections on “The Triumph of Music: Copyrights and Performers’ Rights in Music’ (2010) IPQ 153.
• Bently, L. (2009) 'Authorship Of Popular Music In UK Copyright Law', Information, Communication & Society, 12: 2, 179 — 204
• Benton, K.M. "Can Copyright Law Perform the Perfect Fouette?: 1 Keeping Law and Choreography on Balance to Achieve the Purposes of the Copyright Clause" 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 59 2008-2009
• Braveman, A.W. "Duet of Discord: Martha Graham and Her Non-Profit Battle Over Work For Hire" 25 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 471 2005
• Carriere, L "Choreography and Copyright. Some Comments on Choreographic Works as Newly Defined in the Canadian Copyright Act" This resource can be accessd at http://www.robic.ca/admin/pdf/279/105-LC.pdf
• Connelly, S. "Authorship, Ownership, and Control: Balancing the Economic and Artistic Issues Raised by the Martha Graham Copyright Case" 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 837 2004-2005
• Cook, M. "Moving To A New Beat; Copyright Protection for Choreographic Works" 24 UCLA L. Rev. 1287 1976-1977
• Cramer, L.B. "Copyright Protection For Choreography: Can It Ever Be 'En Pointe'? Computerized Choreography Or Amendment: Practical Problems Of The 1976 U.S. Copyright" 1 Syracuse J. Legis. & Pol'y 145 1995
• Danitz, B. "Martignon and Kiss Catalog: Can Live Performance Be Protected?" 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1143 2004-2005
• De Freitas, D. "Copyright and Music" Journal of the Royal Musical Association, Vol. 114, No. 1 (1989), pp. 69-79
• Fisher, K. A. "The Copyright in Choreographic Works: A Technical Analysis of the Copyright Act of 1976" 31 Copyright L. Symp. 145 1984
• Fitzgerald, J.E. "Copyright and Choreography" CORD News, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Jul., 1973), pp. 25-42
• Forcucci, B.M. "Dancing Around the Issues of Choreography & Copyright: Protecting Choreographers After Martha Graham School of Dance Foundation, Inc v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc." 24 QLR 931 2005-2006
• Freedman, R. "Is Choreography Copyrightable? A Study of the American and English Legal Interpretations of "Drama"". 2 Duq. U. L. Rev. 77 1963-1964
• Frith, S. and Marshall, L. (eds) "Music and Copyright" Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2nd ed (2004)
• Frith. S and Marshall, L "Music and Copyright" 2nd ed. Edinburgh University Press (2004)
• Ginsburg, J. C., "Exceptional Authorship: The Role of Copyright Exceptions in Promoting Creativity" (February 20, 2013). Evolution and Equilibrium: Copyright this Century, (Susy Frankel and Daniel Gervais, eds. 2013), Forthcoming; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 13-338. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2221458
• Gray, J. A. "The Law of Entropy and Dance" Dance Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1/2 (1981 - 1982), pp. 47-50
• Helfer, L. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights” 49 Harv. Int’l. L. J. 1 (2008)
• Kutner, S. and Rich, H. "Dirty Dancing" 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 325 2004-2005
• Lakes, J. M. "A Pas Deux For Choreography and Copyright" 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1829 2005
• Lim Saw, C. "Protecting the sound of silence in 4'33" - a timely revisit of basic principles in copyright law" 2005 E.I.P.R. 467
• Lula, K. "The Pas Deus Between Dance and Law. Tossing Copyright into the Wings and Bringing Dance Custom Centrestage" 5 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 177
• Mirell, L. "Legal Protection for Choreography" 27 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 792 1952
• Overton, T. J. "Unravelling the Choreographer's Copyright Dilema" 49 Tenn. L. Rev. 594 1981-1982
• Pauwelyn, J. ‘The dog that barked but didn’t bite: 15 years of intellectual property disputes’ (2010) 1 JIDS 2, 389-42
• Sadurski, W. “Allegro without Vivaldi: trademark protection, freedom of speech, and constitutional balancing” E.C.L. Review 2012 8(3) 456-492
• Singer, B.A. "In Search of Adequate Protection for Choreographic Works: Legislative and Judicial Alternatives vs. The Custom of the Dance Community" 38 U. Miami L. Rev. 287 1983-1984
• Smith, L. & Waterton, E. 2009 '"The Envy of The World" Intangible Heritage in England', in Laurajane Smith and Natsuko Akagawa (ed.) Intangible Heritage, Routledge, Abingdon, England, pp. 289-291
• Swack, C. "The Balanchine Trust: Dancing Through the Steps of Two-Part Licencing" 6 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 265 1999
• Traylor, M. 1981. ‘Choreography, Pantomime and the Copyright Revision Act of 1976.’ New England Law Review 16: 227, 237
• Van Camp, J. 1994-95 Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1994): 59-92.
• Waelde C. and Schlesinger, P. ‘Music and Dance: Beyond Copyright Text?’ (2011) 8:3 SCRIPTed 257
• Waelde, C. Harmon, S. and Brown, A. "Do you see what I see? Disability, Technology, Law and the Experience of Culture", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 43, no. 8, 2012, 901-930
• Yeoh, F. 2012. "Copyright Law Does Not Adequately Accommodate the Art Form of Dance". PhD thesis. Birkbeck College
• Yeoh, F. ‘Choreographer’s Copyright Dilemma,’ Entertainment Law Review, 2012, Issue 7, 201-208.
• Yeoh, F. ‘Choreographers’ moral right of integrity,’ Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 1. 43-58
• Yeoh, F. ‘The copyright implications of Beyoncé’s “borrowings,”’ Choreographic Practices 2013 Volume 4 No. 1, 95-117
• Yu, P.K. ‘Intellectual property and human rights in the non-multilateral era’ 64 Fla. L. Rev. July 2012 no 4 1045
• Zechner, P.C., Schnek, Vogel & Musger "Re The Joey Racino Show" [2009] E.C.C. 26

Human Rights law

• Donders , Y. and Volodin, V. "Human Rights and Educational, Social and Cultural Developments and Challenges" UNESCO Publishing and Ashgate (2007)
• Dworkin, R. "Taking Rights Seriously" Duckworth (1977)
• Fagan, A. "Human Rights: Confronting Myths and Misunderstandings" (Edward Elgar 2011)
• Galligan, B. and Sampford, C. (eds), Rethinking Human Rights The Federation Press (1997)
• Ignatieff, M. (ed.), "Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry" Princetown University Press (2001)
• Kayess, R. and French, P. 2008 "Out of Darkness, into Light? Introducing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities" Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), pp. 1-34
• Osiatynski, W. "Human Rights and their limits" CUP (2009)
• Quinn, G and Degener, T. "Human Rights and Disability. The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights In the Context of Disability" Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations (2002)
• Symonides, J. (ed.), "Human Rights: Concepts and Standards" Dartmouth Publishing Co Ltd and UNESCO (2000)
• Vanhala, L. "Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization" (CUP 2013)

Cases

• Case C-145/10, Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH et al
• Case C -393/09 Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace
• Case C- 406/10 SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd
• Case C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening
• SAS Institute Inc.v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWHC 69

• Equality and Human Rights Commission

  The Equality and Human Rights Commission is the statutory body which promotes are protects human rights and equality across the 'protected' categories e.g. disability, gender, age, sexuality etc. This organisation covers the UK as a whole, however Northern Ireland and Scotland have their own human rights commissions.

  http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/

• EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

  The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is a combination of civil, political, economic and social rights as they are applied in the EU. It also contains additional rights related to a right to clean environment. It is intended to be a single text document, gathering together rights that exsist under other instruments.

  http://www.eucharter.org/

• Intellectual Property Office

  This site provides useful information regarding how intellectual propertly law is applies within the single market of the European Union.

  http://www.ipo.gov.uk/

• International Telecommunications Union

  The ITU (International Telecommunications Union) cover, among other areas, accessibility and disability to ensure equal access to the information society.

  http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/accessibility/dcad/Pages/default.aspx

• The European Convention on Human Rights

  Established following the breaches of human rights during World War II, the European Convention on Human Rights follows the theme of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ECHR protects family life, right to freeom of religion, freedom from torture, right to fair trial and right to privacy amongst other areas. The ECHR is enforced by the European Court of Human Rights.

  http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html

• UNESCO

  UNSECO (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) aims to create bonds between countries based upon intellectual and moral solidarity. UNESCO aims to promote intercultural dialogue and interconnected societies.

  http://www.unesco.org/new/en/

• United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

  Arguably the most significant piece of international disability legislation, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities seeks to enforce disabled peoples' rights in the signatory states. The Disability Convention works alongside domestic legislation.

  http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml

• United Nations Human Rights Council

  The UN Human Rights Council represents 47 states responsible for promoting and protecting human rights worlwide. It is headquartered in Geneva and replaced the UN Commission on Human Rights in 2006.

  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/HRCIndex.aspx

• United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

  The UN ICCPR echoes what many other instruments protect and covers self determination and that rights are recognised regardless of gender, race, sexuality etc.

  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx

• United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

  The United Nations ICESCR covers similar rights contained within other human rights instruments such as self determination, favourable work conditions and an adequate standard of living.

  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx

• World Intellectual Property Organisation

  The World Intellectual Property Law Office in a United Nations agency and aims to promote creativity and innovation worldwide through a balanced and effective intellectaul property law system.

  http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en